Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2010, 10:25 AM   #1
Moto2 Contender
Avboden's Avatar
OP
 
Joined: Oct 2007
From: Pullman/Spokane, Wa

I Ride: 2007 BMW F800S, 1999 ATK 605 ESDS/SM, 1978 Honda PA70II (hobbit with kit)
BMW forcing new S1K owners to 9000RPM redline for 600 miles
yeah yeah, I made a thread other than that old one. This deserves it's own topic.


I've just found out that BMW is not releasing new S1000RRs from the dealers until a new fuel mapping has been delivered to the ECU. This will lower the redline to 9000RPM. This will then be removed when the bike hits around 600 miles.


Not quite sure what to make of this...I don't think it's that big of deal but it could point to a few things.

1. BMW is simply wanting to enforce engine break in.
or 2. BMW has already gotten warranty complaints on the engine (I haven't heard of ANY so I don't think this is likely) so they are using this as a precaution.




I've never heard of a manufacturer enforcing breakins like this. What say you? Personally I don't think it's too bad. You can still go like a bat out of hell to 9000RPM, and putting 600 miles on a bike takes 1, maybe 2 days.


discuss, and please keep the hating aside, this is new ground for manufacturers. Will we see others follow suit?

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 

Old 03-02-2010, 10:28 AM   #2
Moto2 Champion
fastfoodfred's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
From: spokane, wa

I Ride: 2008 SXV4.5 + 2006 ZX6RR + 1985 RZ350 + 2010 YZ250F +
lets them out of warranty costs.....potentially.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 10:33 AM   #3
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Jun 2006
From: Seattle, WA

I Ride: 02 RC51,09 KTM 690r enduro
Well this is the highest performance engine out there for a liter bike and the first year so...... Anyway 9000rpm is pretty fast for the street.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 10:35 AM   #4
Je Fa Fa
koorbloh's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
From: Lynnwood, WA
Blog Entries: 5

I Ride: Dr. Six Fitty
“ Quote:
Originally Posted by Avboden View Post
yeah yeah, I made a thread other than that old one. This deserves it's own topic.

and please keep the hating aside,
next time, leave ^ this shit out of your post, you bring it on yourself with this type of shit.

“ Quote:
Originally Posted by Avboden View Post
I've just found out that BMW is not releasing new S1000RRs from the dealers until a new fuel mapping has been delivered to the ECU. This will lower the redline to 9000RPM. This will then be removed when the bike hits around 600 miles.


Not quite sure what to make of this...I don't think it's that big of deal but it could point to a few things.

1. BMW is simply wanting to enforce engine break in.
or 2. BMW has already gotten warranty complaints on the engine (I haven't heard of ANY so I don't think this is likely) so they are using this as a precaution.




I've never heard of a manufacturer enforcing breakins like this. What say you? Personally I don't think it's too bad. You can still go like a bat out of hell to 9000RPM, and putting 600 miles on a bike takes 1, maybe 2 days.

discuss, this is new ground for manufacturers. Will we see others follow suit?
^try posting more like this.

now, to answer your question, according to you, this is the first bike in the history of the world that has the software to enforce such things as a variable red line...so it makes sense to not do it before now.

but, it sounds more like a CYA maneuver to me than a proper break-in procedure...keeping the bike from peak horsepower for a few miles as users get used to the bike is probably a good thing.


from an engineering standpoint: it's more things to test and to have go wrong...it's gotta be a legal/marketing thing

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter

Last edited by koorbloh; 03-02-2010 at 10:37 AM..
 
Old 03-02-2010, 10:46 AM   #5
»-(¯`·.·´¯)-> PNW
vagrant's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
From: Seattle, WA
I guess that stunta dood's bike is in trouble then...

Anyhoo, I think its a smart business decision, given that the capability to enforce it is there for a few reasons:
(a) prevents the number of returned failed engines they are gonna see = less warranty costs and less bad press,
(b) likely reduces the number of noobs/non-noobs that kill themselves on the bike straight after they buy it = less bad press,
(vi) haven't thought this one through yet.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 10:49 AM   #6
Railer
Ti954's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
From: S.E. Idaho

I Ride: CBR954, YZ400F
IB4A............awwwww crap!

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 10:49 AM   #7
Railer
strangerin's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
From: spokane

I Ride: other peoples when they let me, working on Honda VF750
Because they can?
not like there are not recommendations from other mfd.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 10:52 AM   #8
Moderator
KevinD's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
From: Spokane Valley

I Ride: Suzuki Boulevard C90, Honda CM250C, My Wife's Scooter
Is the firmware update going to be covered under warranty, or will it be done at the owner's expense?

KevinD

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 10:53 AM   #9
Racer Extraordinaire
theJrod's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
From: Marysville, WA

I Ride: Scooty Puff Sr: The Doom-Bringer!
BMW did this with the e46 M3 as well. It wasn't a "forced" redline, but when the car was new the tach would flash yellow and red if rev'ed too high. Even after break-in, the car still did that until it was fully warmed up. Great idea, since warm-up is especially important for high performance engines.

The best way to break in an engine is on the dyno. BMW's engine doesn't do anything different than every other engine on the market. An engine is an engine is an engine.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter

Last edited by theJrod; 03-02-2010 at 11:05 AM..
 
Old 03-02-2010, 10:57 AM   #10
DGA
Moderator
DGA's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
From: Portland, Oregon

I Ride: naked
In the past, I've heard that BMW has done the same exact thing on their high-performance car engines. ECU is programmed, during the break in period, to only rev to a certain mark, once the odometer clicks past that point, full engine potential becomes available.

A good source, that has ridden one, tells me the bike is a beast. I want to ride one now.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 10:58 AM   #11
Shredder
gilberjj's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
From: Olympia, WA

I Ride: Zx14
Break-in shmeak-in. I would simply tell them, it's MY money, and I want to rev it NOW! That is bull! All bikes need is a good 20 mile break-in. Then change the oil and run them hard. Think about it, every engine is put on a dyno at the factory to ensure that they don't have any defects.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 11:29 AM   #12
Pit Crew
Hawker's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
From: Seattle, WA

I Ride: Too many
Aprillia did the same thing with the RSV for a long time. Didn't require an ECU reprogram, but the effect was the same. Since that bike liked to drain batteries, most owners got good at the button-dance that reset the rev limiter. I'm sure other manufacturers have done the same, this was just the first that came to mind.

So as far as manufacturers "enforcing" brake in rev limits, there's one example that's over 10 years old. Welcome to the party.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 11:41 AM   #13
Novice Racer
ZXWUT?'s Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
From: Kingston, WA

I Ride: giddily
“ Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawker View Post
Aprillia did the same thing with the RSV for a long time. Didn't require an ECU reprogram, but the effect was the same. Since that bike liked to drain batteries, most owners got good at the button-dance that reset the rev limiter. I'm sure other manufacturers have done the same, this was just the first that came to mind.

So as far as manufacturers "enforcing" brake in rev limits, there's one example that's over 10 years old. Welcome to the party.
I'm sure BMW has had this in the works long before them. I mean, come on, it's BMW. They're super cool and awesome and have F1 technology. They probably even had the F1 technology before F1. My bike uses an internal combustion engine, just like an F1 car but BMW probably came up with that one too. I'm sure of it. A representative told me so; he's my personal representative actually. He tells me things before BMW even knows about it, even though BMW knew about it first.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 11:46 AM   #14
Peg Dragger
SpinCycle's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
From: Eugene, OR

I Ride: A bunch of Clown bikes..
It's an extremely high stress engine without a doubt. I would guess that they have found something in durability testing that they feel the need to take the extra cautious steps. I would also guess that there is no way in hell that they allow this bike to get a rap for failures.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 11:53 AM   #15
Moto2 Contender
Robusto's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
From: Spokane, WA

I Ride: Cuz' it makes me smile!
“ Quote:
Originally Posted by SpinCycle View Post
It's an extremely high stress engine without a doubt. I would guess that they have found something in durability testing that they feel the need to take the extra cautious steps. I would also guess that there is no way in hell that they allow this bike to get a rap for failures.
Highly likely.

And I would suspect the next 'batch' of engines will be tweeked a bit to address that weakness.

But like mentioned above, this is hardly ground-breaking.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 01:37 PM   #16
Peg Dragger
Fat Berries's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
From: Kennewick WA

I Ride: GSXR 1000 2004 MM ed
“ Quote:
Originally Posted by Avboden View Post
yeah yeah, I made a thread other than that old one. This deserves it's own topic.


I've just found out that BMW is not releasing new S1000RRs from the dealers until a new fuel mapping has been delivered to the ECU. This will lower the redline to 9000RPM. This will then be removed when the bike hits around 600 miles.


Not quite sure what to make of this...I don't think it's that big of deal but it could point to a few things.

1. BMW is simply wanting to enforce engine break in.
or 2. BMW has already gotten warranty complaints on the engine (I haven't heard of ANY so I don't think this is likely) so they are using this as a precaution.



I've never heard of a manufacturer enforcing breakins like this. What say you? Personally I don't think it's too bad. You can still go like a bat out of hell to 9000RPM, and putting 600 miles on a bike takes 1, maybe 2 days.


discuss, and please keep the hating aside, this is new ground for manufacturers. Will we see others follow suit?

actually thats the first thing i thought. After seeing what people are doing to them after they get their hands on them lately. Maybe not exactly what they anticipated happening to the engines has shown reason to go ahead and impliment that sort of action. Otherwise why didnt they do it up front.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 02:47 PM   #17
Shredder
gilberjj's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
From: Olympia, WA

I Ride: Zx14
“ Quote:
Originally Posted by SpinCycle View Post
It's an extremely high stress engine without a doubt. I would guess that they have found something in durability testing that they feel the need to take the extra cautious steps. I would also guess that there is no way in hell that they allow this bike to get a rap for failures.
Why is everyone acting like BMW is making an engine like nobody else has ever made...... ALL liter bikes have extremely tight tolerances. That's even more reason to just rev them to the moon from the get go. This doesn't add up.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 02:52 PM   #18
Peg Dragger
SpinCycle's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
From: Eugene, OR

I Ride: A bunch of Clown bikes..
I think that they probably already have had issues even though AV hasn't been notified?? How much power does that bike make at 9K? That would suck to have your buddies on 600s give you a run

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 02:54 PM   #19
Je Fa Fa
koorbloh's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
From: Lynnwood, WA
Blog Entries: 5

I Ride: Dr. Six Fitty
“ Quote:
Originally Posted by SpinCycle View Post
I think that they probably already have had issues even though AV hasn't been notified??
impossible.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Old 03-02-2010, 03:04 PM   #20
Racer Extraordinaire
theJrod's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
From: Marysville, WA

I Ride: Scooty Puff Sr: The Doom-Bringer!
“ Quote:
Originally Posted by gilberjj View Post
why is everyone acting like bmw is making an engine like nobody else has ever made...... All liter bikes have extremely tight tolerances. That's even more reason to just rev them to the moon from the get go. This doesn't add up.
but whatever - I don't think it's a big conspiracy. BMW (and others) have done this before.

__________________
Follow PNW Riders on Facebook and Twitter
 
Reply

  PNW Riders > PNW Riders > Motorcycle Talk


Thread Tools
Display Modes



/pnwriders @pnwriders PNW Riders RSS Feed